The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Recent advance in the understanding of iron metabolism and its role on host defense
|
---|---|
Published in |
Japanese Journal of Clinical Immunology, January 2005
|
DOI | 10.2177/jsci.28.372 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kyoko HISHIKAWA, Kazuhiro IWAI |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 31% |
Other | 3 | 19% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 13% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 56% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 19% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2022.
All research outputs
#5,620,968
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Clinical Immunology
#2
of 12 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,856
of 153,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Clinical Immunology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one scored the same or higher as 10 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them