↓ Skip to main content

改良・建築-都市-土壌連成系モデル(AUSSSM)による都市高温化の構造解析 : 第1報 モデルの理論構成及び標準解

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ), January 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
改良・建築-都市-土壌連成系モデル(AUSSSM)による都市高温化の構造解析 : 第1報 モデルの理論構成及び標準解
Published in
Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ), January 2001
DOI 10.3130/aija.66.79_4
Authors

萩島 理, 谷本 潤, 片山 忠久, 大原 健志

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2014.
All research outputs
#8,119,076
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,867
of 118,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.