The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Sennoside-Hydrolyzing β-Glucosidase from Bifidobacterium Sp. Strain SEN Is Inducible
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, January 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1248/bpb.19.701 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L Yang, T Akao, K Kobashi, M Hattori |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 1 | 50% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 50% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2014.
All research outputs
#7,564,477
of 23,073,835 outputs
Outputs from Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
#733
of 2,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,903
of 79,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
#29
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,073,835 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,974 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.