↓ Skip to main content

Past and Future Earthquakes on the San Andreas Fault

Overview of attention for article published in Science, May 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Past and Future Earthquakes on the San Andreas Fault
Published in
Science, May 2005
DOI 10.1126/science.1111707
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ray J. Weldon, Thomas E. Fumal, Glenn P. Biasi, Katherine M. Scharer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 58 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 20%
Professor 10 17%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 41 68%
Environmental Science 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Mathematics 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 7 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2014.
All research outputs
#7,564,477
of 23,073,835 outputs
Outputs from Science
#48,248
of 78,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,587
of 58,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#225
of 327 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,073,835 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 78,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 327 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.