↓ Skip to main content

Sudden, probably coseismic submergence of Holocene trees and grass in coastal Washington State

Overview of attention for article published in Geology, January 1991
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sudden, probably coseismic submergence of Holocene trees and grass in coastal Washington State
Published in
Geology, January 1991
DOI 10.1130/0091-7613(1991)019<0706:spcsoh>2.3.co;2
Authors

Brian F. Atwater, David K. Yamaguchi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 8%
France 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 35 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 25%
Researcher 10 25%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 24 60%
Environmental Science 4 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Computer Science 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 4 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#8,813,966
of 26,052,823 outputs
Outputs from Geology
#3,043
of 4,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,715
of 59,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geology
#11
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,052,823 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.