The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
CLINICAL EXPERIENCE WITH INTRAVESICAL INSTILLATIONS OF 5-AMINOLEVULINIC ACID (5-ALA) FOR THE PHOTODYNAMIC DIAGNOSIS USING FLUORESCENCE CYSTOSCOPY FOR BLADDER CANCER
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nippon Hinyōkika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology, January 2006
|
DOI | 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.97.719 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Keiji Inoue, Takashi Karashima, Masayuki Kamada, Atsushi Kurabayashi, Yuji Ohtsuki, Taro Shuin |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 20% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 20% |
Researcher | 1 | 20% |
Lecturer | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 80% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2017.
All research outputs
#5,583,444
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Nippon Hinyōkika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology
#9
of 204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,256
of 175,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nippon Hinyōkika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 204 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them