The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Antimicrobial activities of synthetic ferulic acid derivatives
|
---|---|
Published in |
Food Preservation Science, January 2002
|
DOI | 10.5891/jafps.28.183 |
Authors |
Michiyo NAKAUCHI, Shigeaki IKEMOTO, Hisako YAMANISHI, Yoshihiko OZAKI, Takuo TSUNO, Eisaku NOMURA, Asao HOSODA, Hisaji TANIGUCHI |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 38% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 13% |
Other | 1 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 38% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 25% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2022.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Food Preservation Science
#3
of 33 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,778
of 130,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Preservation Science
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one scored the same or higher as 30 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them