The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effect of Hot Water Extracts from Tamogitake on the Suppression of Blood Glucose Elevation in Non-Insulin Dependent Diabetic Mice
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi, January 1998
|
DOI | 10.3136/nskkk.45.618 |
Authors |
Masayuki FUJINO, Puming HE |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 1 | 50% |
Student > Master | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 50% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2002.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi
#113
of 675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,029
of 95,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 675 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.