The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Additional Cases of Chronic Wasting Disease in Imported Deer in Korea
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, January 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1292/jvms.67.753 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tae-Yung KIM, Hyun-Joo SHON, Yi-Seok JOO, Un-Kyong MUN, Kyung-Sun KANG, Yong-Soon LEE |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 12 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 13% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,655,674
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
#49
of 3,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,782
of 151,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
#1
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,546 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.