The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification of Canine Calicivirus Capsid Protein and Its Immunoreactivity in Western Blotting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, January 1997
|
| DOI | 10.1292/jvms.59.97 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Concepcion S. SAN GABRIEL, Yukinobu TOHYA, Takaaki SUGIMURA, Tsutomu SHIMIZU, Shinryo ISHIGURO, Masami MOCHIZUKI |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 20% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 20% |
| Researcher | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2011.
All research outputs
#7,569,361
of 23,085,832 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
#287
of 3,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,942
of 92,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
#8
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,085,832 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,231 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.