The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Preparation of Mixed Oxide Powders in the System CeO2-ZrO2-MOx (M=Transition and Rare Earth Metals) by Coprecipitation Method for the Purification Catalysts of Automotive Emission
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ceramic Society of Japan, January 2003
|
| DOI | 10.2109/jcersj.111.137 |
| Authors |
Toshio NAKATANI, Takahiro WAKITA, Rikuo OTA, Katsuhisa TANAKA, Takashi WAKASUGI |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 22% |
| Researcher | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 3 | 33% |
| Engineering | 2 | 22% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2013.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Ceramic Society of Japan
#95
of 533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,413
of 139,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ceramic Society of Japan
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 533 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.