↓ Skip to main content

Novel Ablation Strategy for Isolating the Superior Vena Cava Using Ultra High-Resolution Mapping

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation Journal, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Novel Ablation Strategy for Isolating the Superior Vena Cava Using Ultra High-Resolution Mapping
Published in
Circulation Journal, June 2018
DOI 10.1253/circj.cj-17-1352
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yasuaki Tanaka, Atsushi Takahashi, Takamitsu Takagi, Jun Nakajima, Katsumasa Takagi, Hiroyuki Hikita, Masahiko Goya, Kenzo Hirao

Abstract

The aim of this study was to categorize the conduction patterns between the right atrium (RA) and the superior vena cava (SVC), and to determine the ideal procedure for SVC isolation using a novel high-resolution mapping system.Methods and Results:RA-SVC conduction was evaluated using the RHYTHMIA system in 113 patients (age 62.8±11.5 years, paroxysmal: 67) with atrial fibrillation (AF) after pulmonary vein (PV) isolation. In 56 patients, a line of conduction block was found to run obliquely just above the sinus node (Block group). The remaining 57 patients did not have block (Non-block group). Non-PV foci were spontaneous or provoked with isoproterenol after electrical cardioversion of pacing-induced AF. In 43 patients with SVC foci (Block group: 22, Non-Block group: 21), SVC was isolated by radiofrequency applications delivered along the line connecting the open ends of the block line (Block group) or by conventional methods (Non-block group). The Block group required fewer radiofrequency deliveries for SVC isolation than the Non-Block group (4.2±0.9 vs. 10.2±2.8 times; P<0.0001). The isolated SVC area was larger in the Block group (15.7±3.7 vs. 10.5±3.1 cm2; P<0.0001). We found that approximately half of patients with AF had a diagonal line of block at the RA-SVC junction that could be utilized to isolate the SVC with fewer radiofrequency deliveries.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 13 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 41%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Unknown 14 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,565,067
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#193
of 2,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,559
of 342,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#1
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.