↓ Skip to main content

金線蓮抽出物の骨粗鬆症予防作用

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Japan Mibyou System Association, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
金線蓮抽出物の骨粗鬆症予防作用
Published in
The Journal of Japan Mibyou System Association, September 2010
DOI 10.11288/mibyou1998.14.237
Authors

増田 貴久子, 小山 智之, 矢澤 一良

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2015.
All research outputs
#6,721,259
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Japan Mibyou System Association
#2
of 40 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,698
of 106,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Japan Mibyou System Association
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 40 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one scored the same or higher as 38 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.