The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
成人における麻疹・おたふくかぜ・風疹混合(MMR)ワクチンの 安全性と副反応
|
---|---|
Published in |
Kansenshōgaku zasshi The Journal of the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi.90.518 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yoshijiro Fujiya, Nozomi Takeshita, Shuzo Kanagawa, Kei Yamamoto, Momoko Mawatari, Satoshi Kutsuna, Kayoko Hayakawa, Narumi Hori, Yasuyuki Kato, Norio Ohmagari |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 35 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 37 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,700,164
of 26,591,670 outputs
Outputs from Kansenshōgaku zasshi The Journal of the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases
#8
of 371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,360
of 404,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kansenshōgaku zasshi The Journal of the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,591,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 371 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them