The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Space Use of Killdeer at a Great Basin Breeding Area
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wildlife Management, April 2000
|
| DOI | 10.2307/3803240 |
| Authors |
Jonathan H. Plissner, Lewis W. Oring, Susan M. Haig |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Peru | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
| Professor | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 11 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 36% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 2 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2018.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#967
of 2,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,857
of 40,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them