The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Preliminary assessment of ecological exposure of adult residents in Fukushima Prefecture to radioactive cesium through ingestion and inhalation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, November 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12199-011-0251-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Akio Koizumi, Kouji H. Harada, Tamon Niisoe, Ayumu Adachi, Yukiko Fujii, Toshiaki Hitomi, Hatasu Kobayashi, Yasuhiko Wada, Takao Watanabe, Hirohiko Ishikawa |
Abstract |
This study aims to estimate the ecological exposure of adult residents of Fukushima Prefecture to ¹³⁴cesium (Cs) and ¹³⁷Cs through ingestion and inhalation between July 2 and July 8, 2011. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 25% |
Japan | 5 | 16% |
Austria | 1 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Mexico | 1 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Italy | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 13 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 29 | 91% |
Scientists | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 59 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 21% |
Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Other | 13 | 21% |
Unknown | 6 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 10 | 16% |
Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 11% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 8% |
Other | 15 | 25% |
Unknown | 11 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2015.
All research outputs
#1,532,383
of 26,148,761 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine
#60
of 556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,990
of 157,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,148,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them