↓ Skip to main content

高速液体クロマトグラフ-四重極飛行時間型質量分析計を用いた飲料中乳および卵主要アレルゲン一斉分析法の開発

Overview of attention for article published in Shokuhin eiseigaku zasshi Journal of the Food Hygienic Society of Japan, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
高速液体クロマトグラフ-四重極飛行時間型質量分析計を用いた飲料中乳および卵主要アレルゲン一斉分析法の開発
Published in
Shokuhin eiseigaku zasshi Journal of the Food Hygienic Society of Japan, July 2018
DOI 10.3358/shokueishi.59.126
Pubmed ID
Authors

Azusa Yamashita, Yasuhisa Miyamoto, Koichi Harayama, Koji Suzuki

Abstract

A method for simultaneous analysis of egg and milk allergens using LC-QTOF-MS was developed. The proteins measured were α-casein, β-lactoglobulin, and ovalbumin, which are the main protein allergens in milk and eggs. The proteins were digested using trypsin, and the digests were analyzed by LC-QTOF-MS. Sixteen peaks were detected that confirmed the amino acid sequences of the digests, and a MRM method with high resolution (MRM-HR) using product ions of these peaks was applied for quantification. Next, validation studies were performed using beverage products to which milk and egg standard protein solutions had been added. Good linearity was achieved over the concentration range of 1.25 to 20 μg/g of milk and egg protein, and acceptable reproducibility and accuracy were obtained at 10 μg/g. Moreover, good agreement was also observed between LC-QTOF-MS and ELISA. These findings suggest that this LC-QTOF-MS method may be useful for determining the milk and egg protein contents of beverages.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2018.
All research outputs
#21,305,573
of 26,161,782 outputs
Outputs from Shokuhin eiseigaku zasshi Journal of the Food Hygienic Society of Japan
#374
of 531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,146
of 343,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Shokuhin eiseigaku zasshi Journal of the Food Hygienic Society of Japan
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,161,782 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 531 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.