The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development of Expert System for Abnormal-Event Recurrence Prevention
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan / Atomic Energy Society of Japan, January 1987
|
DOI | 10.3327/jaesj.29.268 |
Authors |
Takuya NISHIYAMA, Yasushi SHINOHARA |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2015.
All research outputs
#15,839,006
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan / Atomic Energy Society of Japan
#140
of 226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,661
of 44,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan / Atomic Energy Society of Japan
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.