The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Decline of Amphibians in California’s Great Central Valley
|
---|---|
Published in |
Conservation Biology, January 2002
|
DOI | 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10051387.x |
Authors |
Robert N. Fisher, H. Bradley Shaffer |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 139 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 138 | 99% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 138 | 99% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2015.
All research outputs
#5,243,833
of 24,692,658 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#2,022
of 3,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,644
of 130,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#53
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,692,658 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.