The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A next-generation beneficial microbe: Akkermansia muciniphila
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3164/jcbn.18-57 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuji Naito, Kazuhiko Uchiyama, Tomohisa Takagi |
| Abstract |
There have been many reports on the roles of intestinal flora and intestinal environment in health promotion and disease prevention. Beneficial bacteria such as Bifidobacterium and lactic acid-producing bacteria have been shown to improve the intestinal environment, and yield a good effect on metabolism, immunity and nerve response. In this review, in addition to these beneficial bacteria, we introduced Akkermansia muciniphila as a next-generation beneficial microbe. Several reports indicate that Akkermansia muciniphila affects glucose metabolism, lipid metabolism, and intestinal immunity, and that certain food ingredients such as polyphenols may increase the abundance of Akkermansia muciniphila in the gut. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 3 | 17% |
| Palestine, State of | 1 | 6% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 72% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 233 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 13% |
| Researcher | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 10% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 34 | 15% |
| Unknown | 71 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 35 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 18 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 10% |
| Unknown | 84 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#428,163
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition
#13
of 560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,365
of 341,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them