The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
暑熱環境下での自転車走行中における水かぶりが生理的・心理的指標に及ぼす効果;大学生自転車競技選手を対象として
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Training Science for Exercise and Sport, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.11327/trainings.22.357 |
Authors |
金野 亮太, 井上 修平, 山本 正嘉 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 33 | 34% |
Korea, Republic of | 2 | 2% |
Eritrea | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Thailand | 1 | 1% |
Taiwan | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 57 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 95 | 99% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2020.
All research outputs
#572,203
of 26,527,568 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Training Science for Exercise and Sport
#1
of 4 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,808
of 239,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Training Science for Exercise and Sport
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,527,568 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.8. This one scored the same or higher as 3 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them