The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predicting invasiveness of species in trade: climate match, trophic guild and fecundity influence establishment and impact of non‐native freshwater fishes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diversity & Distributions, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ddi.12391 |
| Authors |
Jennifer G. Howeth, Crysta A. Gantz, Paul L. Angermeier, Emmanuel A. Frimpong, Michael H. Hoff, Reuben P. Keller, Nicholas E. Mandrak, Michael P. Marchetti, Julian D. Olden, Christina M. Romagosa, David M. Lodge |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 174 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 12% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 15% |
| Unknown | 31 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 65 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 56 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 35 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,923,637
of 26,488,660 outputs
Outputs from Diversity & Distributions
#526
of 1,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,700
of 297,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diversity & Distributions
#11
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,488,660 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.