The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The origin ofChubutolithesIhering, ichnofossils from the Eocene and Oligocene of Chubut Province, Argentina
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Paleontology, May 2016
|
DOI | 10.1017/s0022336000029802 |
Authors |
Thomas M. Bown, Brett C. Ratcliffe |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
United States | 1 | 8% |
Germany | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 10 | 77% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 38% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 23% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 54% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 38% |
Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,575,658
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Paleontology
#583
of 1,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,955
of 334,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Paleontology
#78
of 373 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,546 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 373 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.