You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Alginate/soy protein system for essential oil encapsulation with intestinal delivery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Carbohydrate Polymers, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.07.033 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mina Volić, Ivana Pajić-Lijaković, Verica Djordjević, Zorica Knežević-Jugović, Ilinka Pećinar, Zora Stevanović-Dajić, Đorđe Veljović, Miroslav Hadnadjev, Branko Bugarski |
| Abstract |
Preparation of alginate-soy protein isolate (AL/SPI) complex beads containing essential oil of thyme was carried out by emulsification of thyme oil in aqueous sodium alginate solution blended with SPI solution, followed by atomization via electrostatic extrusion and gelification with calcium ions. The process parameters were optimized by variation of the alginate (1-2.5 wt.%) and SPI (0-1.5 wt.%) concentrations. Dry alginate-SPI particles exhibited wrinkle surface while shape distortion of hydrogel beads occurred with ≥1.5 wt.% alginate concentration, whereas SPI induced reduction of the particle size. Encapsulation efficiency of 72-80 % based on total polyphenols was achieved. In SGF the samples exhibited oil release of 42-55 % (due to matrix shrinkage and proteins degradation by pepsin activity), while the rest was delivered in SIF within 2.5 h simultaneously with swelling and degradation of the matrix. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 156 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 13% |
| Researcher | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 59 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 18% |
| Chemistry | 12 | 8% |
| Engineering | 12 | 8% |
| Chemical Engineering | 9 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 70 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Carbohydrate Polymers
#3,933
of 5,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,362
of 340,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Carbohydrate Polymers
#62
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,159 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.