↓ Skip to main content

Is ungulate migration culturally transmitted? Evidence of social learning from translocated animals

Overview of attention for article published in Science, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
97 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
twitter
335 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
4 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
260 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
581 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is ungulate migration culturally transmitted? Evidence of social learning from translocated animals
Published in
Science, September 2018
DOI 10.1126/science.aat0985
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brett R Jesmer, Jerod A Merkle, Jacob R Goheen, Ellen O Aikens, Jeffrey L Beck, Alyson B Courtemanch, Mark A Hurley, Douglas E McWhirter, Hollie M Miyasaki, Kevin L Monteith, Matthew J Kauffman

Abstract

Ungulate migrations are assumed to stem from learning and cultural transmission of information regarding seasonal distribution of forage, but this hypothesis has not been tested empirically. We compared the migratory propensities of bighorn sheep and moose translocated into novel habitats with those of historical populations that had persisted for hundreds of years. Whereas individuals from historical populations were largely migratory, translocated individuals initially were not. After multiple decades, however, translocated populations gained knowledge about surfing green waves of forage (tracking plant phenology) and increased their propensity to migrate. Our findings indicate that learning and cultural transmission are the primary mechanisms by which ungulate migrations evolve. Loss of migration will therefore expunge generations of knowledge about the locations of high-quality forage and likely suppress population abundance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 335 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 581 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 581 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 111 19%
Student > Master 98 17%
Researcher 88 15%
Student > Bachelor 55 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 3%
Other 70 12%
Unknown 139 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 220 38%
Environmental Science 90 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 3%
Psychology 14 2%
Social Sciences 10 2%
Other 51 9%
Unknown 178 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1023. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2023.
All research outputs
#16,677
of 26,504,585 outputs
Outputs from Science
#812
of 84,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283
of 350,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#22
of 1,214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,504,585 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 84,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.