↓ Skip to main content

The effects of internal working models of attachment on emotional cognition of facial expressions

Overview of attention for article published in JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON EMOTIONS, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effects of internal working models of attachment on emotional cognition of facial expressions
Published in
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON EMOTIONS, January 2013
DOI 10.4092/jsre.21.28
Authors

Yoshihiro Shima, Yoshikazu Fukui, Yuji Kanemasa, Tamami Mugiyama

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2018.
All research outputs
#23,195,360
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON EMOTIONS
#141
of 154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,040
of 291,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON EMOTIONS
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 154 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.