↓ Skip to main content

Toward more realistic projections of soil carbon dynamics by Earth system models

Overview of attention for article published in Global Biogeochemical Cycles, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
362 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
434 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Toward more realistic projections of soil carbon dynamics by Earth system models
Published in
Global Biogeochemical Cycles, January 2016
DOI 10.1002/2015gb005239
Authors

Yiqi Luo, Anders Ahlström, Steven D. Allison, Niels H. Batjes, Victor Brovkin, Nuno Carvalhais, Adrian Chappell, Philippe Ciais, Eric A. Davidson, Adien Finzi, Katerina Georgiou, Bertrand Guenet, Oleksandra Hararuk, Jennifer W. Harden, Yujie He, Francesca Hopkins, Lifen Jiang, Charlie Koven, Robert B. Jackson, Chris D. Jones, Mark J. Lara, Junyi Liang, A. David McGuire, William Parton, Changhui Peng, James T. Randerson, Alejandro Salazar, Carlos A. Sierra, Matthew J. Smith, Hanqin Tian, Katherine E. O. Todd‐Brown, Margaret Torn, Kees Jan van Groenigen, Ying Ping Wang, Tristram O. West, Yaxing Wei, William R. Wieder, Jianyang Xia, Xia Xu, Xiaofeng Xu, Tao Zhou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 434 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 426 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 104 24%
Researcher 99 23%
Student > Master 35 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 6%
Professor 14 3%
Other 53 12%
Unknown 101 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 114 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 89 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 50 12%
Engineering 11 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Other 19 4%
Unknown 144 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,575,587
of 26,052,823 outputs
Outputs from Global Biogeochemical Cycles
#390
of 1,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,236
of 406,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Biogeochemical Cycles
#8
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,052,823 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.