↓ Skip to main content

Bright and Dark Sides of Transnational Joint Research:

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Sociological Review / Shakaigaku Hyoron, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bright and Dark Sides of Transnational Joint Research:
Published in
Japanese Sociological Review / Shakaigaku Hyoron, January 2014
DOI 10.4057/jsr.65.327
Authors

Daishiro NOMIYA

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2016.
All research outputs
#15,839,422
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Sociological Review / Shakaigaku Hyoron
#211
of 680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,486
of 321,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Sociological Review / Shakaigaku Hyoron
#13
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 680 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.