The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Jamming Transition and Inherent Structures of Hard Spheres and Disks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Physical Review Letters, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1103/physrevlett.109.205701 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Misaki Ozawa, Takeshi Kuroiwa, Atsushi Ikeda, Kunimasa Miyazaki |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Israel | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 64 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 21% |
| Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 37 | 52% |
| Engineering | 9 | 13% |
| Materials Science | 6 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2012.
All research outputs
#14,243,953
of 22,837,982 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#23,504
of 35,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,527
of 179,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#278
of 643 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,837,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 643 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.