The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effect of different cleaning agents on saliva contamination for bonding performance of zirconia ceramics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Dental Materials Journal, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.4012/dmj.2017-376 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Akifumi Takahashi, Tomohiro Takagaki, Takahiro Wada, Motohiro Uo, Toru Nikaido, Junji Tagami |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 22 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 47% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 25 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Dental Materials Journal
#195
of 349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,329
of 341,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dental Materials Journal
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 349 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.