The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A multiscale approach to balance trade-offs among dam infrastructure, river restoration, and cost
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1807437115 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samuel G. Roy, Emi Uchida, Simone P. de Souza, Ben Blachly, Emma Fox, Kevin Gardner, Arthur J. Gold, Jessica Jansujwicz, Sharon Klein, Bridie McGreavy, Weiwei Mo, Sean M. C. Smith, Emily Vogler, Karen Wilson, Joseph Zydlewski, David Hart |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 38% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 155 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 17% |
| Researcher | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Professor | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 15% |
| Unknown | 41 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 33 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 14% |
| Engineering | 16 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 59 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,441,015
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#19,739
of 103,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,615
of 368,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#391
of 966 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 966 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.