↓ Skip to main content

A comprehensive analysis of autocorrelation and bias in home range estimation

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Monographs, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
35 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
153 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
444 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comprehensive analysis of autocorrelation and bias in home range estimation
Published in
Ecological Monographs, January 2019
DOI 10.1002/ecm.1344
Authors

Michael J. Noonan, Marlee A. Tucker, Christen H. Fleming, Thomas S. Akre, Susan C. Alberts, Abdullahi H. Ali, Jeanne Altmann, Pamela Castro Antunes, Jerrold L. Belant, Dean Beyer, Niels Blaum, Katrin Böhning‐Gaese, Laury Cullen, Rogerio Cunha de Paula, Jasja Dekker, Jonathan Drescher‐Lehman, Nina Farwig, Claudia Fichtel, Christina Fischer, Adam T. Ford, Jacob R. Goheen, René Janssen, Florian Jeltsch, Matthew Kauffman, Peter M. Kappeler, Flávia Koch, Scott LaPoint, A. Catherine Markham, Emilia Patricia Medici, Ronaldo G. Morato, Ran Nathan, Luiz Gustavo R. Oliveira‐Santos, Kirk A. Olson, Bruce D. Patterson, Agustin Paviolo, Emiliano Esterci Ramalho, Sascha Rösner, Dana G. Schabo, Nuria Selva, Agnieszka Sergiel, Marina Xavier da Silva, Orr Spiegel, Peter Thompson, Wiebke Ullmann, Filip Zięba, Tomasz Zwijacz‐Kozica, William F. Fagan, Thomas Mueller, Justin M. Calabrese

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 444 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 444 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 90 20%
Student > Master 90 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 15%
Student > Bachelor 36 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 5%
Other 52 12%
Unknown 87 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 182 41%
Environmental Science 106 24%
Engineering 6 1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 1%
Other 24 5%
Unknown 116 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,878,658
of 26,362,953 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Monographs
#153
of 1,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,678
of 452,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Monographs
#12
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,362,953 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.