The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Communicating information on nature-related topics: Preferred information channels and trust in sources
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0209013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily J. Wilkins, Holly M. Miller, Elizabeth Tilak, Rudy M. Schuster |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 20% |
| Unknown | 21 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 14 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 22 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,965,291
of 24,229,740 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#101,255
of 208,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,341
of 444,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,449
of 3,144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,229,740 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 208,500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.