The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pitfall traps: A review of methods for estimating arthropod abundance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Wildlife Society Bulletin, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/wsb.928 |
| Authors |
Rhianna R. Hohbein, Courtney J. Conway |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 23% |
| Mexico | 1 | 8% |
| Austria | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 54% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 250 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 7% |
| Researcher | 11 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 31 | 12% |
| Unknown | 121 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 69 | 28% |
| Environmental Science | 26 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 4% |
| Unknown | 125 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,810,527
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Society Bulletin
#197
of 1,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,792
of 443,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Society Bulletin
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.