↓ Skip to main content

線維筋痛症の酸化バランス防御系と抗酸化剤coenzyme Q10の効果(<特集>慢性疼痛の心身医学)

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 313)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
線維筋痛症の酸化バランス防御系と抗酸化剤coenzyme Q10の効果(<特集>慢性疼痛の心身医学)
Published in
Japanese Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine, August 2017
DOI 10.15064/jjpm.50.12_1151
Authors

永田 勝太郎, 島田 雅司, 長谷川 拓也, 真木 修一, 秦 忠世, 大槻 千佳

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2020.
All research outputs
#8,122,764
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine
#27
of 313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,390
of 328,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine
#7
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 313 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.