You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of New Technology-Based Tools for Dietary Intake Assessment—An ILSI Europe Dietary Intake and Exposure Task Force Evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrients, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3390/nu11010055 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alison L. Eldridge, Carmen Piernas, Anne-Kathrin Illner, Michael J. Gibney, Mirjana A. Gurinović, Jeanne H.M. de Vries, Janet E. Cade |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 290 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 44 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 11% |
| Other | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 33 | 11% |
| Unknown | 95 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 49 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 49 | 17% |
| Unknown | 106 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2021.
All research outputs
#16,580,846
of 26,151,587 outputs
Outputs from Nutrients
#15,043
of 22,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,026
of 450,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrients
#383
of 538 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,151,587 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 538 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.