The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 177 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies new loci and functional pathways influencing Alzheimer’s disease risk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41588-018-0311-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Iris E. Jansen, Jeanne E. Savage, Kyoko Watanabe, Julien Bryois, Dylan M. Williams, Stacy Steinberg, Julia Sealock, Ida K. Karlsson, Sara Hägg, Lavinia Athanasiu, Nicola Voyle, Petroula Proitsi, Aree Witoelar, Sven Stringer, Dag Aarsland, Ina S. Almdahl, Fred Andersen, Sverre Bergh, Francesco Bettella, Sigurbjorn Bjornsson, Anne Brækhus, Geir Bråthen, Christiaan de Leeuw, Rahul S. Desikan, Srdjan Djurovic, Logan Dumitrescu, Tormod Fladby, Timothy J. Hohman, Palmi V. Jonsson, Steven J. Kiddle, Arvid Rongve, Ingvild Saltvedt, Sigrid B. Sando, Geir Selbæk, Maryam Shoai, Nathan G. Skene, Jon Snaedal, Eystein Stordal, Ingun D. Ulstein, Yunpeng Wang, Linda R. White, John Hardy, Jens Hjerling-Leffler, Patrick F. Sullivan, Wiesje M. van der Flier, Richard Dobson, Lea K. Davis, Hreinn Stefansson, Kari Stefansson, Nancy L. Pedersen, Stephan Ripke, Ole A. Andreassen, Danielle Posthuma |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 28 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 7% |
| Spain | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| Argentina | 2 | 1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 108 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 94 | 53% |
| Scientists | 70 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,561 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1561 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 274 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 254 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 160 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 144 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 62 | 4% |
| Other | 195 | 12% |
| Unknown | 472 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 280 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 257 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 142 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 102 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 32 | 2% |
| Other | 193 | 12% |
| Unknown | 555 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 194. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2023.
All research outputs
#218,853
of 26,556,730 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#355
of 7,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,513
of 450,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#10
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,556,730 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.