The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Standards for documenting and monitoring bird reintroduction projects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1755-263x.2010.00113.x |
| Authors |
William J. Sutherland, Doug Armstrong, Stuart H. M Butchart, Joanne M. Earnhardt, John Ewen, Ian Jamieson, Carl G. Jones, Rebecca Lee, Peter Newbery, James D. Nichols, Kevin A. Parker, François Sarrazin, Philip J. Seddon, Nirmal Shah, Vikash Tatayah |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 293 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 76 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 48 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 10% |
| Other | 26 | 8% |
| Other | 27 | 9% |
| Unknown | 39 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 174 | 55% |
| Environmental Science | 79 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 3% |
| Unknown | 42 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,636,395
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#736
of 1,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,287
of 106,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.5. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.