The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Studies on Taste of Ribonucleic Acid Derivatives
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nippon Nōgeikagaku Kaishi, January 1960
|
DOI | 10.1271/nogeikagaku1924.34.6_489 |
Authors |
Akira KUNINAKA |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 4% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 21 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 30% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 17% |
Researcher | 3 | 13% |
Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
Professor | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 48% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 9% |
Engineering | 2 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
Materials Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 5 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2024.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Nippon Nōgeikagaku Kaishi
#1,956
of 7,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#553
of 7,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nippon Nōgeikagaku Kaishi
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,190 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.