The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
実録体小説は小説か : 「事実と表現」への試論
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Literature, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.20620/nihonbungaku.50.12_31 |
| Authors |
小二田 誠二 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 64 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 71 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2023.
All research outputs
#811,736
of 26,493,550 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Literature
#3
of 404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,039
of 333,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Literature
#2
of 307 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,493,550 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 404 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 307 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.