The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Replacement of White-spotted Charr Salvelinus leucomaenis by Brown Trout Salmo trutta in a Branch of the Chitose River, Hokkaido
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI, January 2002
|
| DOI | 10.2331/suisan.68.24 |
| Authors |
Tatsuya Takami, Takuji Yoshihara, Yasuyuki Miyakoshi, Ren Kuwabara |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 50% |
| Professor | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 25% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 3 | 75% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2018.
All research outputs
#8,454,279
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI
#140
of 891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,358
of 132,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 891 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.