↓ Skip to main content

倍電圧整流を用いた同期発電機の新しい自己励磁法

Overview of attention for article published in IEEJ Transactions on Industry Applications, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
倍電圧整流を用いた同期発電機の新しい自己励磁法
Published in
IEEJ Transactions on Industry Applications, May 2016
DOI 10.1541/ieejias.136.375
Authors

水野 秀俊, 近藤 潤次

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2017.
All research outputs
#23,195,360
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from IEEJ Transactions on Industry Applications
#157
of 157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,580
of 312,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEEJ Transactions on Industry Applications
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them