The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Structure of the human M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor bound to an antagonist
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature10753 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kazuko Haga, Andrew C. Kruse, Hidetsugu Asada, Takami Yurugi-Kobayashi, Mitsunori Shiroishi, Cheng Zhang, William I. Weis, Tetsuji Okada, Brian K. Kobilka, Tatsuya Haga, Takuya Kobayashi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 5 | 21% |
| United States | 4 | 17% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 79% |
| Scientists | 4 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 619 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 2% |
| Denmark | 6 | <1% |
| Canada | 5 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Austria | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | <1% |
| Unknown | 577 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 132 | 21% |
| Researcher | 125 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 85 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 76 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 5% |
| Other | 97 | 16% |
| Unknown | 75 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 199 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 103 | 17% |
| Chemistry | 83 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 43 | 7% |
| Other | 59 | 10% |
| Unknown | 89 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2024.
All research outputs
#1,171,570
of 26,504,585 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#34,671
of 100,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,083
of 256,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#372
of 937 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,504,585 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100,753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 103.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 937 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.