The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
POLY ADENOSINE DIPHOSPHATE RIBOSE SYNTHESIS AND NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE TRANSGLYCOSIDASES
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Nutritional Science & Vitaminology, January 1968
|
DOI | 10.5925/jnsv1954.14.supplement_143 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Y. NISHIZUKA, K. UEDA, K. NAKAZAWA, R. H. REEDER, T. HONJO, O. HAYAISHI |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Librarian | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2020.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nutritional Science & Vitaminology
#364
of 1,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,332
of 13,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nutritional Science & Vitaminology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.