↓ Skip to main content

Chimpanzees’ flexible targeted helping based on an understanding of conspecifics’ goals

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
21 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
189 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chimpanzees’ flexible targeted helping based on an understanding of conspecifics’ goals
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2012
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1108517109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shinya Yamamoto, Tatyana Humle, Masayuki Tanaka

Abstract

Humans extensively help others altruistically, which plays an important role in maintaining cooperative societies. Although some nonhuman animals are also capable of helping others altruistically, humans are considered unique in our voluntary helping and our variety of helping behaviors. Many still believe that this is because only humans can understand others' goals due to our unique "theory of mind" abilities, especially shared intentionality. However, we know little of the cognitive mechanisms underlying helping in nonhuman animals, especially if and how they understand others' goals. The present study provides the empirical evidence for flexible targeted helping depending on conspecifics' needs in chimpanzees. The subjects of this study selected an appropriate tool from a random set of seven objects to transfer to a conspecific partner confronted with differing tool-use situations, indicating that they understood what their partner needed. This targeted helping, (i.e., selecting the appropriate tool to transfer), was observed only when the helpers could visually assess their partner's situation. If visual access was obstructed, the chimpanzees still tried to help their partner upon request, but failed to select and donate the appropriate tool needed by their partner. These results suggest that the limitation in chimpanzees' voluntary helping is not necessarily due to failure in understanding others' goals. Chimpanzees can understand conspecifics' goals and demonstrate cognitively advanced targeted helping as long as they are able to visually evaluate their conspecifics' predicament. However, they will seldom help others without direct request for help.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 4 1%
Hungary 3 1%
Germany 3 1%
United States 3 1%
Italy 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 251 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 18%
Student > Master 43 16%
Researcher 41 15%
Student > Bachelor 37 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Other 46 17%
Unknown 35 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 107 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 22%
Social Sciences 13 5%
Neuroscience 12 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 2%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 45 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2019.
All research outputs
#781,886
of 24,896,578 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#12,839
of 101,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,768
of 258,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#83
of 809 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,896,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 809 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.