↓ Skip to main content

Superconductivity Induced by Longitudinal Ferromagnetic Fluctuations in UCoGe

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Letters, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Superconductivity Induced by Longitudinal Ferromagnetic Fluctuations in UCoGe
Published in
Physical Review Letters, February 2012
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.108.066403
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. Hattori, Y. Ihara, Y. Nakai, K. Ishida, Y. Tada, S. Fujimoto, N. Kawakami, E. Osaki, K. Deguchi, N. K. Sato, I. Satoh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Japan 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 94 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 18%
Student > Master 14 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 79 76%
Chemistry 5 5%
Materials Science 3 3%
Unknown 17 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2012.
All research outputs
#13,339,330
of 23,511,526 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#21,947
of 36,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,057
of 251,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#205
of 429 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,511,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 429 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.