You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Disentangling Genetic and Environmental Effects on the Proteotypes of Individuals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.015 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Natalie Romanov, Michael Kuhn, Ruedi Aebersold, Alessandro Ori, Martin Beck, Peer Bork |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 132 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 30 | 23% |
| Germany | 9 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 7% |
| Australia | 6 | 5% |
| India | 4 | 3% |
| Spain | 4 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 48 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 73 | 55% |
| Scientists | 54 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 154 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 26% |
| Researcher | 37 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 9% |
| Professor | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 56 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 27 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 120. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#361,315
of 26,112,783 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#1,951
of 17,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,627
of 366,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#56
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,112,783 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 60.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.