↓ Skip to main content

「取り立て」再考

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Japanese Language Teaching, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 281)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
「取り立て」再考
Published in
Journal of Japanese Language Teaching, April 2019
DOI 10.20721/nihongokyoiku.166.0_15
Authors

藪崎 淳子

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2024.
All research outputs
#15,209,704
of 26,503,275 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japanese Language Teaching
#47
of 281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,881
of 367,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japanese Language Teaching
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,503,275 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 281 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.