↓ Skip to main content

Use of high-throughput screening results to prioritize chemicals for potential adverse biological effects within a West Virginia watershed

Overview of attention for article published in Science of the Total Environment, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of high-throughput screening results to prioritize chemicals for potential adverse biological effects within a West Virginia watershed
Published in
Science of the Total Environment, April 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.180
Pubmed ID
Authors

Levi D Rose, Denise M Akob, Shea R Tuberty, Steven R Corsi, Laura A DeCicco, Jeffrey D Colby, Derek J Martin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 22 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 11%
Environmental Science 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 26 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2019.
All research outputs
#15,707,582
of 26,178,577 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#16,858
of 30,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,702
of 367,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#336
of 674 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,178,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 674 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.