The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pulmonary Endarterectomy and Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension ― Similar Effects on Health-Related Quality of Life ―
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation Reports, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1253/circrep.cr-19-0016 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Naoki Tamada, Kazuhiko Nakayama, Kenichi Yanaka, Hiroyuki Onishi, Yuto Shinkura, Yu Taniguchi, Hiroto Kinutani, Yasunori Tsuboi, Kazuhiro P Izawa, Seimi Satomi-Kobayashi, Hiromasa Otake, Hiroshi Tanaka, Toshiro Shinke, Yutaka Okita, Noriaki Emoto, Ken-Ichi Hirata |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 11% |
| Psychology | 1 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2019.
All research outputs
#20,667,544
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Reports
#218
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#279,321
of 363,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Reports
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.